Resumen: Regarding the first activity, that is, the "investigation of every claim" is worth to determine what must be understood for investigation and if the claim is regarding any situation or if it is limited.
Referencing to the considering part of the Human Rights Commission’s resolution 1994/41, we realize that the existence of a independent and impartial Judiciary, so as independent lawyers, is previous and essential condition to protect human rights. Also we notice that was because of the independence attempts suffered by Magistrates and lawyers, so as the harm made sometimes to the Judiciary guarantees, that was determined to create a control mechanism in charge to follow up there matters, which resulted into the designation or a three years period, of a Special Rapporteur.
Therefore, we can conclude that the Rapporteur’s designation is mainly performed to protect the independence of Magistrates and lawyers. Consequently, it became indispensable to acknowledge the notion that the Special Rapporteur has about independence, mainly because based in this notion he will perform the investigations and also we will be able to determine the congruence of its performance.